INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2023

For the year ended 30 September 2023

Material risks and opportunities

Risk management arrangements

We manage our risks and opportunities to support the achievement of our strategic objectives by identifying opportunities to protect, create and capture value. Our risk management arrangements align with the principles of King IV, ISO 31000:2018, and generally accepted good practice in a manner that is fit-for-purpose. Ultimate accountability for the adequacy of the risk management programme across Tiger Brands rests with the board. The board has assigned oversight responsibilities for risk governance and the development of appropriate organisational and cultural maturity to the risk and sustainability committee.

The group executive committee, supported by category-level executive committees, is tasked with the design, implementation and operation of the risk management system. Category-level management teams, supported by group operations, continuously monitor and manage their risk profiles, and are responsible for developing and maintaining an appropriate risk-aware culture.

Risk profiling and oversight

We adopt a comprehensive approach to identifying risks that includes a top-down as well as bottom-up analysis. The top-down approach starts with a group view of Tiger Brands, where consideration is given to the operating environment, the business model, and the associated objectives and strategies defined by the group. Similarly, category leadership is required to analyse their operating environments, business models, products and strategies to identify category-specific risks; these are also reported at the group level for oversight. Common category-level risks are then identified, which may be escalated and managed at the group level as needed.

In addition to identifying risks that impact our ability to achieve our organisational objectives, management also considers factors that may develop into risks, even in those instances where our understanding of these factors is not sufficient to develop comprehensive mitigating strategies. These are termed 'emerging risks' and are also tracked through the various oversight structures following a top-down and bottom-up identification process.

We believe that effective risk management practices generate additional benefits beyond the value protection outcomes typically associated with risk remediation activities. As part of its risk analysis process, management identifies and reviews opportunities to create or enhance competitive advantage, and/or increase our reputation, with a view to optimising value creation.

The group executive committee oversees the identification of group risks and responses. Category-level management oversees and manages category-specific risks and reports the material risks to the group executive committee through the operational risk management committee. A consolidated Tiger Brands risk profile is then compiled and reported to the board risk and sustainability committee before being submitted to the board. In addition to the analysis and remediation of top risks, we maintain a combined assurance programme that aims to provide stakeholders with comfort that the control measures deployed to shape risks are adequate and effective.

Risk appetite and tolerance

General risk appetite and tolerance ranges are defined by group executive management and annually approved by the board. These ranges are reflected in the heat maps and provide general guidance regarding expected responses to the mapped risks.

For each risk, group executive management determines a targeted residual risk level that represents risk-specific appetite levels. These targets are set against the backdrop of the approved risk appetite and tolerance ranges and more specifically define the nature and extent of each risk's control improvement plan. This target and the associated control improvement plan is subject to management and non-executive director oversight in accordance with Tiger Brands' risk management policy.

While the group will accept risk to achieve its ambitions of being a market-leading, international, diversified FMCG company, Tiger Brands has an aversion to risk in the areas of food safety, the delivery of quality products, and loss of life.

Our top risks

Our material risks are those that exceed our residual risk tolerance level and are thus identified as having the most material implications for Tiger Brands and its stakeholders.

The inherent risk heat map presented below represents the inherent risk profile of our material risks. Without adequate remediation, the risks are potentially a threat to the group as a going concern and thus merit management attention. Following management's intervention through various remediation programmes the material risk profile shows a marked improvement, albeit still in need of further remediation. This is outlined below in our residual risk heat map.

The positioning of cost competitiveness does not appear to improve on the back of implemented control processes. This reflects our cautious stance on risk. Although we are confident in our response strategies, we monitor the risk for evidence of control effectiveness before adjusting residual risk ratings, a position that permeates across all our risks.

In addition to the risks listed below, we recognise that climate-related risks are becoming increasingly significant, not only directly to our business model but also at a broader economy-wide level. Given the growing materiality of this issue, we are maturing our processes to identify, assess and remediate the climate-related risks across our value chain.

The following table reviews the implications, mitigation measures, and year-on-year trend in the risk rating for each of our top risks.

Material risk
1.1 MARKET RESPONSIVENESS+
1.2 COST COMPETITIVENESS+
2.1 PEOPLE SECURITY+
2.2 PEOPLE SAFETY+
2.3 FOOD SAFETY+
2.4 CYBER SECURITY+
2.5 CONSUMER PREFERENCES+
2.6 THIRD-PARTY SUPPLIER RISKS+
2.7 INDUSTRIAL ACTION+
2.8 INSUFFICIENT ELECTRICITY SUPPLY+
2.9 SECURITY OF FOOD SUPPLY+
Climate change: a particular risk type

We do not classify climate change as a single risk. In our minds, it is too wide a risk definition to effectively respond to all its drivers and consequences in a single mitigating strategy.

Consequently, we refer to climate change as a “risk type” to ensure that it receives due consideration when emerging and active risks are identified across our value chain.

Our drive to identify and respond to specific climate-related risks is gaining momentum. This year, we have taken some pragmatic steps to identify and assess specific climate-related risks, including engaging with internal and external specialists. For example, we have engaged a water specialist to undertake an assessment of water security risks across our value chain, and we have had internal discussions with our agricultural commodity managers to explore the security of food supply as a specific concern.

Climate-related risks are identified, managed and reported on through the established Tiger Brands risk methodology and structures to ensure that it is not a stand-alone consideration but fully integrated with our business oversight and management practices.

The table below provides a generalised overview of the climate-related risks, opportunities and impacts of greatest significance for our business.

Risks
Supply chain disruptions Extreme weather events and climate change, aggravated by local water scarcity and energy instability, could lead to significant disruptions in the supply of commodities and raw materials, and the distribution of products.
Regulatory and legal risks New legislative requirements, including new taxes and stricter regulation on environment and health, present legal and compliance risks.
Reputational risk Failure to address economic transformation, public health, food security and climate change issues could damage Tiger Brands’ reputation and market share, especially with rising social and shareholder activism.
Opportunities
Resource efficiency By implementing water-efficient processes, energy-saving technologies and renewable energy sources, we can help mitigate resource scarcity, lower costs, and reduce environmental impact ( see sustainability report).
Sustainable and resilient supply chains By developing more local, diversified, sustainable, and resilient supply chains, we can support local economies, reduce vulnerability to geopolitical or climate-induced disruptions, and strengthen our ability to partner with suppliers to address social and environmental impacts and risks in the supply chain (see sustainability report).
Waste reduction and circular economy initiatives Reducing packaging waste and food waste, as well as developing innovative new packaging solutions, service models, and circular material flows, offers the potential to reduce costs and to develop new income streams and business models that reduce resource consumption and environmental impact, and that support enterprise development initiatives that address social inequality and economic exclusion (see sustainability report).
Impacts
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions GHG emissions from our direct operations and manufacturing plants, purchased electricity, upstream manufacturing and agriculture (land conversion) and manufacturing, and downstream transport contribute to climate change. Organic waste that we send to landfill contributes to climate change through the release of methane.
Resource use Water scarcity and energy security are acute issues in South Africa. We use energy and water in our operations, and the efficiency and circularity of our use of these resources in our operations directly impact the general availability of these resources for communities and ecosystems (water). Our use of borehole water potentially impacts groundwater quality and availability.